Skip to main content

Feeling the Body in Process: Interoceptive Awareness

Our body is working without stop. The heart is beating, the lung is allowing to inhale and exhale the air, the stomach is trying to digest the food eaten, and all the other internal organs keep working without any break so that they keep you alive. Humans cannot control these visceral activities. They function automatically, without our permission. Yet, this does not necessarily mean that we are not aware of them. People have the capacity to be aware of the stimuli created in the body performing internal activities. Interoceptive awareness refers to one’s ability to perceive and sense those signals that originated in the body. 

Photo by KALZ📸🇺🇬 from Pexels
Photo by KALZ📸🇺🇬 from Pexels

Interoceptive awareness is a very insightful and perspective concept for all subdisciplines of psychology. For example, in terms of mental disorders, a considerable number of researches showed a link between negative mood states and maladaptive function of interoception, in the meaning of, misinterpretations or misperceptions of the body signals and this made the interoception awareness skills included in treatment programs.

The essential idea of the relationship between emotion and interoception can be explained through James-Lange theory of emotion proposing that emotions are the results of our physical reactions to external stimuli. In other words, emotions derive from the individuals’ interpretations of his/her physiological arousal.

So, the first step takes place in the autonomic and somatic nervous system which activates visceral changes and the skeletal system. As a very classic example of this theory; when you see a big bear in the forest, first, your heart begins to beat rapidly, you sweat and tremble and those lead to the emotion of fear.  From this perspective, the idea is that a higher score at interoceptive awareness (people who are more sensitive to bodily signals) predicts higher emotional intensity. Researches with clinical patients reached interesting outcomes regarding this theoretical relationship. For instance, in anorexia nervosa, low interoception awareness is generally highlighted and it is considered as related to ignoring hunger signals of the body in AN. In the case of anxiety-related disorders, on the other hand, results have shown that people with panic disorders are demonstrating an excessive focus on interoceptive information, but they use this information “maladaptively”. These findings brought about the need to differentiate neural pathways that are responsible for attention to interoceptive information and those who are responsible for the perception of this information.[i]

In this article, I am going to talk about how the procedure is going and which kind of tasks, measurements, and techniques are used to map neural mechanisms underlying the process of interoception in the light of the significant experiment by Critchley and his colleagues(2004).

Heartbeat Detection Task

Do you feel your heart is beating when you give attention to it?

One commonly used way to analyze individuals’ level of interoceptive awareness is applying tasks measuring the sensations of the cardiovascular system.  It includes different methods and one of them is the heartbeat detection task. In this task, there is an external stimulus in the background, it is generally a note which is triggered by one’s own ECG or pulse rhythm and the participants are required to decide whether their heart is beating synchronically or not with this musical tone (external stimulus). Critchley et al. added a control task requiring to give attention to the external cue. In this task, subjects responded to the question that whether the notes that are given have different pitches or they are all same.  This control task allowed researchers to see differences in the brain depending on attention given to internal and external stimuli and to find out whether the performance of subjects is related to something else rather than interoceptive awareness.

What else?

In addition to the heartbeat detection task, researchers conducted a clinical questionnaire measuring symptoms of anxiety, depression and they used scales to indicate how participants feel currently and how they feel generally, as a trait affect. Those questionnaires have been used to analyze the relationship between interoceptive awareness and emotion, and brain regions related to this relationship.

A link between bodily signals and emotions: rAI

Functional imaging data showed what is going on in the brain when the participants are performing heartbeat detection tasks. It is found out that the insula and some forebrain regions were related to attention directed to the internal state.  Other than that, there was a quite striking discovery. There was a region that illustrated different levels of activity and size depending on the internal information accuracy. This was the right anterior insula (rAI).

FMRI data displayed a positive correlation with activity in the right anterior insula and interoceptive accuracy and rAI demonstrated sensitivity to notes’ timing with the heartbeat too. Interoceptive awareness tasks with delayed notes were accompanied by higher rAI activity when compared to synchronized notes, confirming that rAI has a role to make a person discriminate interoceptive information from external stimuli.[ii] Furthermore, there was a correlation between interoceptive accuracy and negative affectivity and the self-reported anxiety symptoms of participants which lead to the conclusion that activity in the rAI provides prediction about the emotional characteristics of individuals. Findings were supported by the further analysis made with MRI morphometry with a group of subjects who completed the body perception questionnaire measuring how a person aware of body processes.  Results pointed out a correlation between gray matter volume in rAI and the score of awareness of bodily process sub-test of body perception questionnaire.

To sum up, in this elegant study, it is found out that the anterior insula has a role in perceiving interoceptive information and turning this information into reportable, subjective emotional or physiological feeling states.[iii] In other words, the right insula is the region where the cognitive representation of the visceral information takes place and becomes a substructure for explicit emotions.  Moreover, correlation analysis with psychological questionnaires provided a neurological structure for the theory proposing a relationship between enhanced sensitivity to visceral signals and negative mood.

While finishing the article, I recommend watching the presentation about interoception by Hugo Critchley in 2015 to those who found this subject interesting and want to get more novel information. The YouTube link is below. 

 REFERENCES


[i] Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7(2), 189-195.  https://www.overcominghateportal.org/uploads/5/4/1/5/5415260/nature_neurosi_interoception_neural_systems.pdf

[ii] Craig, A. D. (2004). Human feelings: Why are some more aware than others? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(6), 239-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.004

[iii] Rotman Institute of Philosophy. (2015, December 7). Hugo Critchley: Interoception, Emotion, and Self: How the Heart Gates Feelings and Perceptions [Video]. YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGqr5buHsXc&ab_channel=RotmanInstituteofPhilosophy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Autonomy of Person, Making Mistakes and Carl Rogers

Life is full of choices. Through the decisions we made, from little ones to vital ones, we are drawing our ways in life. But do we have a choice about everything? Aren’t there things we can't choose to get rid of and things we can't stop to affect our actions? According to the founder of person-centered therapy , Carl Rogers, people are completely autonomous individuals who are fully responsible for their actions. They are capable of being aware of their potential and use it for the good of themselves. Some might think that it is not fair to put all the responsibility on people who are tiny little members of huge world orders under the influence of thousands of variables. Mega factors aside, sometimes people are incapable of controlling even their own body and health. It is easy to imagine a simple headache and how it affects everything. Moreover, doesn't responsibility bring guilt? Isn't it a relief for us to say, "I have no fault in this” when things go wrong? So...

I Don’t Know What to Say When You Ask How I Feel - Alexithymia

Alexithymia is a personality construct whose Latin compounds literally mean  “no words for feelings” .  In this text you're going to read about:  The emergence of the alexithymia concept, Description of alexithymia by Sifneos and Nemiah, Explanatory examples for the core features, Recent approaches, Empathic abilities in alexithymia, Neural substrates Historically, alexithymia was first put forward in the context of somatoform disorders by Sifneos (1970) as a dichotomous clinical variable based on a conjoint work with Nemiah. In fact, clinical observations related to alexithymia were already reported by many psychiatrists, way before Sifneos brought about the term. At that time, psychosomatic disorders were explained through Freudian theories which highlight the unconscious conflicts as a reason for physical symptoms. However, difficulties to reach empirical evidence which has already caused to get theories of Freud frequent criticism throughout his life continued to be t...